<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Ferraresi &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulferraresi.com/category/other/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com</link>
	<description>Paul Ferraresi Blog is a compilation of topics including, but not limited to, finance, personal wealth building, motivation, political education, business tips, and, most importantly, personal growth and development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tax Increases are Here!</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2010/04/07/tax-increases-are-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2010/04/07/tax-increases-are-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every workshop I conduct often leads me to ask the participants:  “In the future, do you think tax rates will be going lower, staying the same, or going higher?”  Without question, 99% of the people vote higher.
	One does not need to be a tax attorney to know what is ahead for all Americans. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every workshop I conduct often leads me to ask the participants:  “In the future, do you think tax rates will be going lower, staying the same, or going higher?”  Without question, 99% of the people vote higher.</p>
<p>	One does not need to be a tax attorney to know what is ahead for all Americans.  Here is why rates are going higher:</p>
<p>•	Congress moves rates from high to low and back to high.  You have been in a “low” period.</p>
<p>•	Effective 12/31/2010, the Bush tax cuts will expire, so rates go back up to pre-Bush.  This means an average of 3-5% higher for every bracket.</p>
<p>•	The war on terrorism will continue for another generation and will require increasing amounts of money.</p>
<p>•	Social Security and Medicare are broke.  The Baby Boomers are just starting to lean on these programs, so both programs will need increasing amounts of money.</p>
<p>•	We have a financial crisis not seen in two generations – a stimulus and mortgage bailout program were failures and thus, will require more monies to pay back these borrowed funds.</p>
<p>•	The present administration is designing programs so that 45% of American taxpayers (the payers) will provide for 55% of American non-taxpayers (the takers).  Thus, the payers (producers) will be required to ante up more for the takers (non-producers).</p>
<p>Now, all the hype has been…”tax the rich.”  Be careful what you wish for…you will become part of the rich very soon, according to the present administration’s plan.</p>
<p>•	A report from the IRS for the 2008 tax returns filed, only 256,000 returns out of 142 million returns filed, which is the top 2%, had an adjusted gross of over $250,000 (what some may think is rich).  This top 2% paid 45% of all federal taxes collected even though they only earned 25% of all income.  Hmmm…. I thought the system was to be fair…you know, top 10% pays 10%, top 50% pays 50%, and so forth.  Right now, 50% of all those that earn income pays NO TAX!!</p>
<p>•	Even if they <ins datetime="2010-04-07T14:52:59+00:00">confiscated </ins>100% of the income of the top 2%, it would not touch the deficit.  Do the math yourself.  </p>
<p>•	They asked Willy Sutton…“why do you rob banks?”  He said…“cuz that is where the money is.”  Look for Congressional Revenuers to come looking for more money… “where is the money” – the middle class.</p>
<p>To make my point, let’s look at a few new taxes that have come into effect due to the new health care law:</p>
<p>1)	Medicare taxes will increase by 0.9% on joint household wages above $250,000 (on 1/1/2013).  Thus, if a couple had $400,000 in wages, they would have a new tax of $1,350  ($150,000 x 0.9%).  This amount is not indexed for inflation.  So, in the future more people will creep into this area.  Also, as with every tax they place on high income earners, it eventually goes down to the middle class.</p>
<p>2)	The same upper-income couple above will be subject to a 3.8% new tax on unearned income (interest, dividends, royalties, rents, and capital gains).  Say our couple earns $50,000 in interest from their bank accounts.  This would produce a new $1,900 tax bill for them (sources:  House of Representatives and CBO).  This will have a dramatic negative effect on savings and the stock market.  In all cases, see your tax advisor for details.</p>
<p>3)	As you sell your home in the future, there will be a <ins datetime="2010-04-07T14:52:59+00:00"><strong>4%</strong></ins> tax on the gross sales proceeds for everyone.  (Hmmm…I thought no new taxes on those earning less than $250,000 – then, they said only on those above $200,000, then they said on those above $150,000.)</p>
<p>You know Congress does all its tax planning based on the “static” approach.  That is, they assume everything will stay static and no one will do anything to avoid taxes.  In our example above, our couple will incur over $3,000 in taxes and they will do whatever it takes to lower or reduce the taxes.  This avoidance will lead to less economic growth, fewer jobs, less tax revenue coming in, then they will have to raise taxes somewhere else and…well, you connect the dots.  Just cut spending.  Stop this madness!!</p>
<p>Now, I have just covered a few of the new taxes.  Rather than waiting for the sword to cut you, I am demanding you take action now…or forever hold your peace.</p>
<p>	I have been advocating for years to get your money into programs that will allow your money to grow tax-free.  You can have access to the money tax-free at any time and when you die, it transfers income tax-free.  This strategy is a layup with a ladder, or a stolen base on a wild pitch.</p>
<p>	Please contact us at (713) 871-5919 or at conswella@fgmci.com to take action now.  If you wait until the rates go up, it will be too late.</p>
<p>	Ah yes….discipline or regret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2010/04/07/tax-increases-are-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Election Year Investing</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/07/11/election-investing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/07/11/election-investing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/07/11/election-investing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an election year and it would appear that one party appears to possess more energy, the Democrats. Many of them are talking about raising taxes at a time when the global economy is becoming increasingly competitive and many of our leading trading partners are slashing tax rates. Consequently, some observers are saying if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an election year and it would appear that one party appears to possess more energy, the Democrats. Many of them are talking about raising taxes at a time when the global economy is becoming increasingly competitive and many of our leading trading partners are slashing tax rates. Consequently, some observers are saying if a tax-hiking president were to win the White House, it would discolor their long-term outlook for U.S. equities.</p>
<p>This is a much more important election – or perhaps it’s important in very different ways – than many people think. It’s also much simpler that it appears, although maybe these issues will sharpen as the election gets closer. There are really only two issues that I see.</p>
<p>Much or most of the sustainable growth in employment and output in the decade had been attributable to the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts; one candidate will be in favor of maintaining them, and one will favor letting them expire, which will equate to a massive (<em>and disastrous</em>) tax increase. The latter candidate will probably also favor dealing with the looming insolvency of Social Security through increases in payroll taxes, and be more inclined to retreat into protectionism, both of which would be very deleterious to the American economy.</p>
<p>The other issue will be the war on Islamofascism in general, and U.S. policy in Iraq in particular. One candidate will favor continuing the fight to stabilize Iraq, and thus to thwart Iran. The other will propose an announced schedule of rapid withdrawal, effectively ceding the region to Iran, and to chaos. So the choices are going to be very clear, because the candidates – even as they move toward the center in the general election campaign – are going to be philosophically very far apart.</p>
<p>The economy and the markets may be the wild card in this race, because the third and fourth quarter of 2008 are likely to show very powerful resurgence in output and especially in corporate earnings. Of course, perception will be the key: Bush 41 ran for re-election on the message that the recession was over and strong growth was back. This was true, but nobody believed him. In any event, I’ll stay invested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/07/11/election-investing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
