Archive for Retirement

The Hidden Costs of the Golden Years

If you’re getting ready to retire and think you are prepared, you might want to think again. Once you walk out your office door for the final time, you’re bidding farewell not only to workplace politics and long commutes, but also to free eyeglasses and tooth fillings, subsidized hearing aids and acupuncture and a host of other health-care benefits you may not even have realized were there.

In their place, you and your spouse are facing the likelihood of forking out about $225,000 between your 65th and 80th birthdays – on everything from prescription deductibles to Medicare premiums to stuff that Medicare just doesn’t cover.

The biggest issue is that people generally aren’t saving enough for retirement – and then there is this whole category of cost that they aren’t even considering because they figure Medicare will look after everything. No one is prepared for the magnitude of this expense, especially because it comes in bits and pieces throughout the years.

The harsh reality is that with each year that a retiree lives, health-care cost of one kind or another – doctor visits, specialist treatments, medications and so on – are likely to rise. That $225,000 tab for the next 15 years is up from $170,000 for a retiring couple just five years ago, according to an analysis by Fidelity Investments.

The question of how to cover those expenses is becoming more critical as more companies cut back or simply eliminate health-care coverage for their retirees. Only about 20% of companies with 500 or more employees now offer at least some health-care benefits to retirees who are eligible for Medicare, down from about 40% in 1993.

Some companies don’t extend this benefit to new employees; others raise the hurdles on their existing population of workers. Financial advisers agree that the problem of funding retirement health-care looms largest for those with less than $5 million or $6 million in retirement savings. Most concur that richer retirees will be able to cover the vast majority of their health-care needs through a combination of insurance products and out-of-pocket spending – and without throwing their whole retirement plans or life styles into chaos. That’s why you can’t wait until you retire to figure out how you will go about funding these expenses.

So what’s the best way to proceed? Assuming Fidelity’s numbers are right – and most planners agree they seem to be – a couple will need something on the order of $12,000 to $15,000 a year for health cost in the early years of retirement, and more in later years. If you want to cover that kind of expense by investing, you’d need to start with savings of about $215,000, assuming you can get 7% annual returns. In other words, you’ll want to include an amount like that when determining your optimal retirement portfolio. This amount of health savings is in addition to the amounts you need to fund normal retirement living expenses. So, if you could “FREEZE” the $215,000 health care retirement account, that is, if there were no inflation. Then you would need to set aside about $20,000 per year for the 10 years prior to retirement. (ouch!)

At the moment, there are few investment vehicles designed specifically for health care. But one that many advisors recommend is the Health Savings Account, or HSA. The HSA gives anyone a chance to set aside pre-tax income in a separate account to pay only for medical expenses. They can be established at any point, and dollars not used in any given year can be rolled over into the future – and ultimately into retirement.

Do You Have a Retirement Parachute?

From 1974 to 2004, the percentage of Americans covered by an active defined-benefit pension plan shrank from 44% of the workforce to 17%. Today, more that 60% of workers are employed by companies that offer new hires only a 401(k) plan, a savings scheme originally intended to complement traditional pensions, not replace them.

Nobody reminds you that what matters most isn’t the stock market’s quarterly report card, but whether your account is on target to provide adequate retirement income.

The custodian that manages your money is not required to note that, if you’re not covered by a defined-benefit plan, your 401(k) should equal at least 10 times your salary right before retirement. If you’re earning $100,000 at age 65, a $1 million nest egg isn’t a windfall; it’s a necessity. Even more improbably, a 65-year-old making $40,000 a year ought to have accumulated $400,000.

By any reasonable reckoning, fewer than 20% of Americans working today in the private sector will be able to retire comfortably. The average head of household aged 62 to 65 has only about $110,000 in combined 401(k) account and rollover IRA balances – not even twice the median salary around $61,000 for that age group. Adding to the pain of near-empty nest eggs is the fact that the income taxes on the portion of salary contributed are postponed until retirement – when folks can least afford to pay them.

The 2006 Pension Protection Act allows employers to automatically enroll new hires at a 3% contribution rate, regardless of their age – a rate that’s less than one-third of what they need to save at age 25, assuming a typical employer matching contribution rate of 3% of pay.

Waiting until age 35 to start retirement savings increases the required contribution rate to more than 17% of pay; waiting until age 40 boosts the needed savings rate to more that 23%. A worker who starts saving at age 50 ought to be putting away nearly half his paycheck. Such contribution rates exceed the legal maximums for tax-deferred saving; besides, they are simply impossible for just about everybody. Keep in mind there are non qualified alternatives that have no contribution limits and produce 50% more net spendable income than 401K plans.

Of course, there’s lots of shame to go around. While the Pension Protection Act of 2006 made it clearer that 401(k) fund advisers can advise participants on which funds to invest in, it didn’t require anyone to provide advice on what contribution rate would be prudent.

Workers and employers must create a bipartisan dialogue on retirement. The pension paternalism favored by the Democrats has failed because pension regulations make the requirements so onerous that few companies want to start or continue a defined-benefit plan. On the other hand, the Republicans’ tax-break approach to retirement savings has failed because people haven’t responded to savings incentives. But… it is not the fault of either party, rather, most Americans have their heads in the sand in setting aside money for retirement. Then, when the crisis comes these same people demand of the government to bail them out.

Oh dear…. discipline or regret!

Saving for Retirement

It is a known fact that the majority of Americans (97%) are not on track to reach financial independence. Confusing opinions from the TV “talking heads” on how to invest leaves one feeling helpless.

Have you made the best choices in your 401K plans and other investments? I found a site that will provide basic information on retirement planning. In addition, it provides a simple approach to calculating your retirement path. Take a look at it… it may put your mind at ease, or, create more sleepless nights…

www.CountOnYourRetirement.com

Your Plan B Business

    Everyone should have a sideline business. It should be started while you are working, not after you lose your job or quit.

    A full time business start up usually takes 5 years to reach breakeven. Obviously, starting a side business part time may take longer than 5 years to get into the black.

    Why should you set up a side business? It provides a safety net for you and your family. It can provide additional monies to fund your retirement. Finally, it can provide an avenue of exit if you “hate” your J.O.B.

    There are numerous tax benefits in owning your own business. One major benefit is to set up your own small business 401K plan.

    Small-business 401(k) plans might provide the opportunity you need. These plans are also known as Solo 401(k), Solo(k), and Individual K. These investment vehicles are mostly used by small-business owners and entrepreneurs. Small-business 401(k) plans are perfectly designed to accommodate rollovers from employer-managed 401(k) plans, and they can be opened with the intent of funding them solely with future annual contributions (though that is rarely done).

    The advantages of a small-business 401(k) are significant. They offer greater control of funds than does an employer-managed 401(k) or a SEP-IRA. They offer higher contribution limits than Roth accounts ($15,500 plus $5,000 for age 50 and over). And they are easy to manage and administer.

    These plans offer you a broader range of investments to choose from instead of the limited number of options found in traditional plans.

    Here is a general overview of the most widely used categories.

      Alternative Investments in a Small-Business 401(k)

    Small-business 401(k) plans can invest in the following assets, though the most common investments are real estate-related. Investments can include income-producing assets through the use of non-recourse loans. Unlike a self-directed IRA, a small-business 401(K) is not subject to Unrelated Debt Financed Income Tax on income-producing property.

    • Start a business or buy a franchise
    • Buy part of a business
    • Buy a partnership interest or form limited partnerships
    • Fund limited liability companies or corporations
    • Purchase startup company stock or member shares
    • Private placements (private company stock investment or loans)
    • Private party mortgages and notes backed by real estate
    • Purchase residential rental properties, multi-unit buildings, commercial property, storage facilities, boat slips, marinas, and parking spaces
    • Bare land parcels, lots, acreage, timberland, RV parks, mobile home parks, and other income-producing land
    • Tenants in common for real estate investments
    • Tax lien certificates
    • Tax deeds
    • Lease options
    • Royalty rights
    • Franchise rights
    • Commodities and futures
    • Commercial paper
    • Equipment leases
    • Joint ventures
    • Stocks, bonds, mutual funds, CDs
    Prohibited: Collectibles

“Six Paths to Retirement”

A new report by the Vanguard Group has found that Americans aged 40 to 69 expect to gradually ease into retirement, with work playing an important role in their early years of retirement.

“Six Paths to Retirement” details a variety of ways Americans approach retirement, including “downshifting” into retirement by reducing their work hours or taking on part-time work or a less stressful job. Nearly two in three respondents aged 55 to 69, the study found, “have downshifted already or plan to do so in the future.”

The Vanguard study found that retirees take six distinct paths to retirement. The “still working” crowd, the largest group of respondents (35%), stopped working fulltime in their 60s, yet, for financial reasons, continued with some type of part-time work or self-employment. The early retirees, which made up about 30% of survey respondents, stopped working in their 50s and never started working again. Vanguard says while these folks retired earlier than usual, this group “fit the conventional view of retirement,” and had adequate financial resources to support an early retirement. About 12% of the respondents were dubbed semi-retirees because while they retired from full-time work in their 50s, they “took on high levels of part-time work or self-employment,” to stay active, enjoy themselves, or to earn discretionary income, the study found.

One-quarter of Americans, the study reports, follow three other paths. There are those who will never retire – 10% of respondents – as well as what Vanguard dubs “returnees,” (5%), who retired early but then returned to work for financial and psychological reasons. The third route is the “spouse’s retirement” path (9% of respondents), which Vanguard says “represents individuals who had lower participation in full-time work in their 40s and 50s and pegged their retirement to that of their spouses.”