<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Ferraresi &#187; Retirement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulferraresi.com/category/retirement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com</link>
	<description>Paul Ferraresi Blog is a compilation of topics including, but not limited to, finance, personal wealth building, motivation, political education, business tips, and, most importantly, personal growth and development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On Path for Retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/09/16/on-path-for-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/09/16/on-path-for-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With your 401k /IRA and personal account values being down it seems that no one wants to look up.
The sun will shine again. Trust me. Most people do not want to examine the track they are on for retirement. It is too painful to face the reality. They are acting like an ostrich and putting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With your 401k /IRA and personal account values being down it seems that no one wants to look up.</p>
<p>The sun will shine again. Trust me. Most people do not want to examine the track they are on for retirement. It is too painful to face the reality. They are acting like an ostrich and putting their head in the sand.</p>
<p>Look…if you are retiring in 10 years, then, whether you take active, positive steps now, or, avoid looking at the situation…you will still hit retirement in 10 years. The train does not stop for you.</p>
<p>I suggest looking at the situation in a healthy approach. I have suggested in this blog a site that is simple, yet effective and I feel it is worth another mention. I have worked with National Life Group and they do an excellent job for all my clients. Their retirement site allows you to do many calculations. Visit their site at: http://experienceretirement.com/.</p>
<p>It is easy to navigate and very helpful. As always, if you have questions or need assistance contact me at (713) 871-5919 or paul@fgmci.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/09/16/on-path-for-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Much Do I Need?</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/08/27/how-much-do-i-need/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/08/27/how-much-do-i-need/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am constantly asked… how much do I need for retirement? There are rules of thumb all the way up to sophisticated models that we use to find the correct amount.
Obviously, there are some basic information that one must understand. When one retires, they are usually at their lifetime’s highest income. Most recent studies (and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am constantly asked… how much do I need for retirement? There are rules of thumb all the way up to sophisticated models that we use to find the correct amount.</p>
<p>Obviously, there are some basic information that one must understand. When one retires, they are usually at their lifetime’s highest income. Most recent studies (and a rule I have always used that is successful) show that you will need about 90% of your preretirement income during retirement.</p>
<p>Some people balk at this claiming they will only need 50% of their income as the kids have moved on, mortgage is paid off and they won’t need to commute. Well, how many times in your life have you already retired? You see what experience do you have? First off, remember the income and lifestyle you were living say 20 or 30 years ago? Could you go back to that lower income and lifestyle? More importantly… would you? Next, whenever you have paid off a debt (car or credit card loan), what happens to that money? Have you really saved it or do unusual expenses always eat it up? What do you think happens when your mortgage gets paid off? The same thing!!! One other item is your health expenses and premiums skyrocket during retirement to easily 8-10 times what you currently are paying (since your employer usually subsidizes a large portion of your health premiums).</p>
<p>With that out of the way, now answer me… how long will you live after retirement? Seriously!! That has a huge effect on the number needed. Hmmm. You have life insurance to protect if you die early, but, we are trying to plan for you not dying early.<br />
Say your preretirement income is $50,000 per year. Using the 90% factor, then, you will need $45,000 in the first year of retirement. (We will cover the inflation factor very soon). Now the sad part is that the average baby boomer has about $50,000 saved for retirement. Ouch!</p>
<p>The sophisticated studies show the “safe” withdrawal rate from your retirement account (savings) should be about 4.5% for the first year (and then increased for inflation each year). This will assure an almost certain likelihood the portfolio will be able to provide income for 30 years. This assumes a portfolio mix of 60% stocks and 40% bonds. So, to fund a first year income stream of $45,000 with a 4.5% withdrawal rate, you will need a $1,000,000 portfolio at age 65.</p>
<p>Okay, you now have a simple formula to extrapolate how much more or less you need based on your current income.<br />
If you need some ideas on how to build up your retirement nest egg, please contact us at founders@goundersgroupinc.net. For additional reading on this, go to the Kitces report at <a href="http://www.Kitces.com">www.Kitces.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/08/27/how-much-do-i-need/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cashing In Your IRA/401K?</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/07/22/cashing-in-your-ira401k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/07/22/cashing-in-your-ira401k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/?p=281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of this writing the stock market has made a major recovery from the March 2009 low.
Many people wanted to “get out” of their retirement plans because they had dropped so much in value. That is the wrong reason to get out of your retirement plans early. I have written many times in this blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of this writing the stock market has made a major recovery from the March 2009 low.</p>
<p>Many people wanted to “get out” of their retirement plans because they had dropped so much in value. That is the wrong reason to get out of your retirement plans early. I have written many times in this blog that IRA / 401K and other qualified plans are “time bombs.” You will end up paying substantially more in taxes when you retire than the amount you saved in taxes while contributing (that is, the extra amount in taxes you pay in retirement is almost 10 times the amount of taxes you saved while contributing).</p>
<p>I am asking you to think outside the box. Although most retirement plans have improved in value by 25-30% over the past few months they are still underwater in value from their highs 18 months ago.</p>
<p>	Consider cashing out of these “time bombs” now, pay the tax now, and invest the monies into:<br />
(1) A program that will generate lower capital gains tax in the future. With the massive stimulus package spending EVERYONE will be paying much higher taxes in the future. So to avoid this why not pay your taxes in the future at a lower capital gains tax rate than the higher ordinary income tax rate? </p>
<p>(2) A better approach….cash out of your retirement plans and, pay the tax now. Then invest in a program that will grow tax free, you can have access to the money tax free even before age 59 ½ without any tax or penalties, and when you die, the money transfers tax free. </p>
<p>Folks this is a layup with a ladder. Need some more direction on this? Email us at Darlyn@fgmci.com or call (713) 871-5919. By all means subscribe to our new blog <a href="http://www.wealthyfutureblog.com">www.WealthyFutureblog.com </a>to learn more about this topic and other wealth building programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/07/22/cashing-in-your-ira401k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living Long, Living Well</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/03/24/living-long-living/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/03/24/living-long-living/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/03/24/living-long-living/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason for the increase in annuity products is multifaceted. Not only is a drove of baby boomers set to retire, many of them without adequate retirement assets, the current crop of boomers are retiring at a time when investment markets are producing few gains and many losses. Enter annuities, which a recent Wharton Financial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the increase in annuity products is multifaceted. Not only is a drove of baby boomers set to retire, many of them without adequate retirement assets, the current crop of boomers are retiring at a time when investment markets are producing few gains and many losses. Enter annuities, which a recent Wharton Financial Institutions Center study co-sponsored by New York Life Insurance Co. found could produce a lifelong cash stream for investors at a cost that is as much as 40% less than a traditional portfolio of stocks, bonds and cash. That means an investor at age 65 can guarantee that same income with $600,000 that a neighbor may need $1 million to produce with stocks, bonds and cash – and without the guarantee. For actual payouts read on.<br />
	Income annuities can also be critical to mitigate the risks of longevity, says the study’s co-author David F. Babbel, an insurance and risk-management professor at the Wharton School. While “on average” half the population lives until 85, half of those who make it past age 65 will live beyond the age of 85. And all of those people who live past 85 have a chance to live past 100, and they are going to need income, Babbel says. That is where sound income planning, especially the concept of income annuities with longevity features, can be so beneficial, he adds. Since they guarantee income for life, the investor sidesteps the risk of unfortunate investment decisions, poor performing markets and running out of money.<br />
	More food for thought. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2009/03/24/living-long-living/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/11/retirement-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/11/retirement-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/11/retirement-dilemma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across an article in the November/December 2008 issue of NEFE Digest (a publication for professional financial educators) and I could not resist sharing it. It holds many of the concepts that I have taught you in this blog. The article was written by Brent A. Neiser, CFP. He is director of Strategic Programs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an article in the November/December 2008 issue of NEFE Digest (a publication for professional financial educators) and I could not resist sharing it. It holds many of the concepts that I have taught you in this blog. The article was written by Brent A. Neiser, CFP. He is director of Strategic Programs and Alliances and chief organizer of NEFE’s Retirement Income Decumulation Think Tank. Now, although it is being written to us as financial educators, I know you will find it useful as you look over my shoulder. Enjoy and hopefully you will get a few subtle “aha’s.”</p>
<h3>Myths of Retirement</h3>
<p><strong>Ever have someone tell you that after working hard for the last 40+ years they are “finally ready to retire?” Retire on WHAT, you think. They have virtually no investments, little savings, maybe a house with limited equity, and not much else.</strong></p>
<p>We in the financial education community have to explode the many myths associated with living in retirement and on social security. Astoundingly, many Americans still believe that they can somehow live their life in retirement by relying almost exclusively on that monthly government check. Social Security was designed to be a supplemental income source, not the whole retirement package.</p>
<p>At least 50 million families are currently “undersaved” and racing headfirst towards retirement. Many soon-to-be retirees often don’t think about (or are too overwhelmed to think about) how they are going to pay for retirement. And once they actually get there, they realize they have not adequately calculated the cost of living through retirement. Alarmingly, they often overestimate how long their personal savings will last once they retire and begin spending their limited nest egg.</p>
<p>Too many people think of 65 (or even earlier) as the so-called “magic number” when they will stop working. Quite possible they spent their life working at a job they didn’t like, but it paid the bills. Even worse? A life spent at a job they didn’t like that didn’t pay the bills.</p>
<p>But absent significant health issues, there is no particular reason to retire at 65. All of us have significantly more years beyond that arbitrary date in which we can have vibrant, intellectually stimulating, and challenging lives. Regardless, many stop working, more than likely too early. Doing that and claiming Social Security before full retirement age will reduce lifetime inflation-adjusted earnings by up to a third.</p>
<p>So, how do we motivate people to work longer and save more? It is not an easy sell. Since the 1950s, when the retirement age was roughly 68, we’ve been marching steadily towards a younger retirement age. Right now, it is about 63 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
<p>But working longer and planning too far into the future is counterintuitive to most of us. We’ve been the target of a lifetime of advertising telling us that if you want it, buy it now on credit and worry about tomorrow- tomorrow.</p>
<p>Regardless, of whether someone is in their forties, fifties, or beyond, we as financial educators need to affirm that building up large retirement savings is not a luxury but a necessity. Soon-to-be retirees need to understand not only to save for the “fun” part of retirement, but also for the unavoidable. Medicare co-pays will sap their accumulated savings as they grow older. Inflation will not stop just because they have gone into retirement. As they age, just about everything will cost more, even as they draw down their accumulated savings and investments.</p>
<p>There are some solutions. By retiring later, people can avoid drawing down what little savings they have accumulated and actually can continue to add to their savings. In many cases, they’ll also be able to keep their employer sponsored health insurance.</p>
<p>An added bonus of working past 65: more time to pay off any high-interest outstanding debts, like credit cards, car loans, or personal lines of credit. The goal is to go into retirement debt-free or close to it.</p>
<p>As professionals, it is imperative we provide more education and retirement product options for those in or nearing the retirement phase of their life. Obviously, we also must provide comparable direction and assistance for those in the savings and accumulation phase.</p>
<p>In particular, we must get soon-to-be retirees to talk about annuitizing at least a part of a lump sum distribution from an IRA or 401(k) to provide a stable, secure, and predictable income. But, would-be buyers need to know to shop around and ask lots of questions, because fees and surrender provisions vary significantly.</p>
<p>We need to motivate people to seek out professional investment advice regardless of their current income and how little investment income they may have accumulated. A few hours and a few hundred dollars’ worth of professional advice can make a significant difference in the long run to someone with even limited savings.</p>
<p>As much as anything else, we need to help people understand that retirement is a goal that you can ease into, not an event that has to take place at a specific, pre-determined age. Individuals can go on “retiring” for decades. Retirement, as we see it now, undoubtedly will look different in 10 or 20 years time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/11/retirement-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Happening To Your Money</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/02/what%e2%80%99s-happening-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/02/what%e2%80%99s-happening-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Career and Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/02/what%e2%80%99s-happening-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An associate of ours, Kim Barmann, in New Mexico sent this report. I wanted to share it with you to emphasize the importance of staying vigilant in saving money.
$ People Are Saving Less

The Commerce Department reports that Americans are saving at the lowest rate since the Great Depression.
Personal savings stood at a national level of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An associate of ours, Kim Barmann, in New Mexico sent this report. I wanted to share it with you to emphasize the importance of staying vigilant in saving money.</p>
<h3>$ People Are Saving Less</h3>
<ul>
<li>The Commerce Department reports that Americans are saving at the lowest rate since the Great Depression.</li>
<li>Personal savings stood at a national level of negative $6.2 million in January.</li>
<li>About 40% of Americans say they are saving nothing for retirement. One reason: Over the past year, inflation rose 4.3% while salaries rose only 3.4%.</li>
<li>One in four Americans told the Employee Benefit Research Institute that they have no saving at all.</li>
</ul>
<h3>$ Retirement Is Coming Later and Later</h3>
<ul>
<li>The percentage of Americans 55 or older working full-time increased from 54.2% in 1993 to 64.4% in 2005.</li>
<li>Nearly one in four people between 65 and 74 was still in the labor force in 2006, compared with just one in five in 2000.</li>
<li>A recent study indicates that 17% of workers have suffered a reduction of retirement benefits offered by their employers in the last two years. Of these, only one-third say they are saving more for their retirement as a result.</li>
</ul>
<h3>$ Student Debt Is Piling Up</h3>
<ul>
<li>Tuition cost have climbed 60% since 2000, and the average graduating senior now owes more than $20,000, according to the National Center for Education Statistics-twice as much as graduates owed a decade ago.</li>
<li>Nearly a quarter of recent grads owe in excess of $25,000.</li>
<li>While student debt rose 8% from 2005 to 2006, starting salaries rose only 4%.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are the statistics. Break away from the crowd and do NOT be one of the statistics. Call us if you want to stand out from the crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/12/02/what%e2%80%99s-happening-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Dipping…Legally</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/11/11/double-dipping%e2%80%a6legally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/11/11/double-dipping%e2%80%a6legally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/11/11/double-dipping%e2%80%a6legally/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you could retire early and still get full retirement benefits?? It is not a new concept but many people do not know about it.
The current Social Security system allows individuals to claim reduced, early retirement benefits beginning at age 62. Individuals who wait until their full retirement age to collect receive about 30% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you could retire early and still get full retirement benefits?? It is not a new concept but many people do not know about it.</p>
<p>The current Social Security system allows individuals to claim reduced, early retirement benefits beginning at age 62. Individuals who wait until their full retirement age to collect receive about 30% more in monthly benefits. If they wait until age 70 to collect, their benefits will be about 60% larger than at age 62. So what should you suggest your clients do?</p>
<p>Assuming a normal life expectancy and using the interest rate on government bonds, the actuarial present value of lifetime benefits are the same for those taking early retirement as for those waiting to take benefits at a later age. Of course, if one’s life expectancy is not normal (due to illness or bad luck or particularly good genes or good luck) one retirement age will look more attractive than another.</p>
<p>Look at going for the best of both worlds: retire at age 62, then pay back and reapply for Social Security benefits at age 70 if you come to regret your early decision.</p>
<p>A couple claimed their Social Security benefits at age 62 and now they each receive reduced benefit of $13,250 annually (in 2008 dollars). If they had waited until their normal retirement age (65) to collect benefits, the couple would each receive $18,928 a year. If they waited until 70 (this year) to apply, their benefit in 2008 would have been $20,693, thanks to the delayed benefit credit.</p>
<p>If they choose to pay back the Social Security benefits they have received over the past eight years, they will each receive the much higher benefit for the rest of their lives. If they take this option, each would repay $94,556 to Social Security. They would then each begin receiving $20,693 a year (the same as if they had waited until age 70 to begin receiving benefits); and as a result, they would have approximately 56% more in real Social Security benefits every year for the rest of their lives. “Essentially, the government has given them an interest-free loan.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/11/11/double-dipping%e2%80%a6legally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Uncertainties of Retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/14/uncertainties-retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/14/uncertainties-retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/14/uncertainties-retirement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people think their retirement will consist of a leisurely life of traveling or playing golf after picking up their gold watch.
Soon to be retirees have many questions to address before showing up for their last day. First off will be when you retire. It will make a major difference in the amount of money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people think their retirement will consist of a leisurely life of traveling or playing golf after picking up their gold watch.</p>
<p>Soon to be retirees have many questions to address before showing up for their last day. First off will be when you retire. It will make a major difference in the amount of money you’ll actually have in retirement. Most people fall into the trap of taking Social Security too soon.</p>
<p>Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show Americans are increasingly taking early retirement. In the 1950’s the average retirement age was 67.6 years old. By the 1960’s the age dropped to 64.6 and by the 1990’s it dropped to 62.6.</p>
<p>It appears, according to a study by NEFE, those with combined pre-retirement income of $30,000 to $100,000 have NOT planned adequately for their retirement. With to much debt, not enough money saved and few plans for how they will decumulate their funds it is a time bomb ready to explode.</p>
<p>The key is more education and a desire to be self sufficient. Looking at the above statistics on retirement age I reflected that in the 1960’s the average person did retire around age 65. (This was mandated by the government as the “official” retirement age). Most workers died about 7-8 years after retirement with their spouse surviving about another 10 years. Their pension and Social Security made it a somewhat “comfortable” retirement. Today, the life expectancy for a healthy 65 year old male is near age 85. The surviving spouse is expected to live into their early 90’s. Wouldn’t it make sense for people to work to say age 78 or so? Then, following the above formula for the worker would live 7-8 years after retirement and still have a “comfortable” retirement. Isn’t that what is happening as you go to many stores and see countless senior citizens happily working?</p>
<p>This would solve all the financial problems for Social Security, keep people active and productive, and, provide society with dedicated hard working employees. The activity would keep people fit, possibly stop them from deteriorating mentally and physically and take a strain off our country’s medical facilities. Ah yes, as George Burns said “If I knew I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself.”</p>
<p>The response I get from most people on the above idea…. Paul, I hate my job and just want to get out. My response…. Who chose that job and why not get out now. “Well, I need the great pay and benefits” My response…. You have complained for 10 years saying the same thing. Why didn’t you set up a side business 10 years ago so you could walk away today.” Ten years from now you will probably say the same thing again, so, why not start to make changes now?</p>
<p>Ah yes, discipline or regret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/14/uncertainties-retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprinting to the Finish Line</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/07/sprinting-finish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/07/sprinting-finish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/07/sprinting-finish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life is like a marathon race. Many ups and downs. Pain from each step we take, yet, euphoria as we pass each marker. As you run and try to reach your goals for this year… why not sprint???
I find reading books helps one reach insights. Doug Andrew, author of many best selling books can help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is like a marathon race. Many ups and downs. Pain from each step we take, yet, euphoria as we pass each marker. As you run and try to reach your goals for this year… why not sprint???</p>
<p>I find reading books helps one reach insights. Doug Andrew, author of many best selling books can help you “sprint” to financial independence. I am a trained advisor on Doug’s team and suggest a basic book from his collection…..</p>
<p><strong>________THE______________________________________________</strong></p>
<p><strong>LAST CHANCE MILLIONAIRE</strong></p>
<p>IT’S NOT TOO LATE TO BECOME WEALTHY by Douglas R. Andrew</p>
<p>	PRE – PAY YOUR MORTGAGE<br />
	SOCK AWAY AS MUCH MONEY AS YOU CAN IN YOUR 401K!<br />
	DIVERSIFY YOUR PORTFOLIO!</p>
<p>THAT’S THE GUARANTEED WAY TO A SAFE AND SECURE RETIREMENT!</p>
<p><em>BUT IS IT?</em></p>
<p>For the millions of Baby Boomers facing retirement, here is a brilliant – and refreshing contrarian – guide to accumulating wealth and security regardless of age, income, or current assets.</p>
<p>According to Doug Andrew, the bestselling author of MISSED FORTUNE 101, too many Americans are being led down the wrong financial path. Even worse, many Baby Boomers find themselves panicking – fearful that they’ve already fallen too far behind to ever catch up.</p>
<p>In this indispensable and eye-opening guide, Andrew provides fresh new pathways to reaching financial security – pathways that all Americans need to consider now. Centering on his Three Miracles of Wealth Accumulation: the Miracle of Compound Interest, the Miracle of Tax-Favored Accumulation, and the Miracle of Positive, Safe Leverage, Andrew explodes many of the commonly-held myths about 401ks, pensions, paying down one’s mortgage, and other forms of retirement planning. Along the way, Andrew offers unique strategies that will not only increase your wealth, but also help readers enjoy their best years while securing their future.</p>
<p>	Douglas R. Andrew’s first hardcover, <em>Missed Fortune 101</em> (0-446-57657-3), was published by Warner Business Books in 2005 and has sold in excess of 500,000 copies.</p>
<p>	With an estimated 83 million Baby Boomers approaching retirement, books that focus on financial security are perennial bestsellers, as demonstrated by the blockbuster success of the #1 <em>New York Times</em> bestselling Rich Dad series by Robert T. Kiyosaki.</p>
<p>	Americans are perpetually striving to join the millionaire’s club, as evidenced by the continuing success of <em>The Millionaire Next Door</em> (Longstreet Press, 1996), which has sold more than two million combines copies.</p>
<p>Doug Andrew’s initial books <ins datetime="2008-10-07T18:19:31+00:00">Missed Fortune</ins>, <ins datetime="2008-10-07T18:19:31+00:00">Missed Fortune 101</ins> and <ins datetime="2008-10-07T18:19:31+00:00">Millionaire by Thirty</ins> are other ones you need to read.</p>
<p>If you want more information email me at <ins datetime="2008-10-07T18:19:31+00:00">founders@foundersgroup.net</ins> or call 713-871-5919.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/10/07/sprinting-finish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boomer Retirements Could Go Kaboom</title>
		<link>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/09/16/boomer-retirements-could/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/09/16/boomer-retirements-could/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/09/16/boomer-retirements-could/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite recent studies that paint a rosy picture of how well baby boomers are prepared for retirement, a study from Barclays Global Investors paints a gloomier scenario. Some of the results, which will be published in full in the fall issue of The Journal of Investing, are being released in Barclays’ InvestmentInsights.
The authors, who say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite recent studies that paint a rosy picture of how well baby boomers are prepared for retirement, a study from Barclays Global Investors paints a gloomier scenario. Some of the results, which will be published in full in the fall issue of <em>The Journal of Investing</em>, are being released in Barclays’ <em>InvestmentInsights</em>.</p>
<p>The authors, who say optimistic conclusions for the retirement health of baby boomers are based on erroneous assumptions, have titled their analysis as a warning- <em>The Future Shock of Retirement</em>. Jonathan Cohen, Barclays Global Investors senior fixed income strategist; Matthew H. Scanlan, head of American institutional business; and Matthew O’Hara, head of securitized credit research, say changes are needed by government, employers and individuals to avert a retirement crisis.</p>
<p>	They say errors in some recent studies occur because the researchers assume current costs and benefits will remain stable in the future. Instead, “current benefit levels (for Social Security and Medicare) are unsustainable,” the authors say. “Today, 6.9% of federal income taxes go toward the two programs. By 2020, as much as 26.6% of all federal income taxes would be required to sustain current Social Security and Medicare benefits for the greatly expanded retiree population.” </p>
<p>	Defined contribution (DC) pension plans now outnumber defined benefit (DB) plans, a trend that won’t be reversed, and “DC plans typically fail to address longevity and inflation risk.” At the same time, pre-retirees are saving less than they were 10 and 20 years ago and less than people in countries such as Germany and Japan save now.</p>
<p>	The wealthiest top half of pre-retirees “look reasonably well prepared for retirement under current conditions, but are highly sensitive to future changes,” the trio concludes.</p>
<ol>
<ol>
(From Financial Advisor Magazine, June 2008)</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulferraresi.com/2008/09/16/boomer-retirements-could/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
